English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This study explored the feasibility of using movable and reusable boarding and alighting (BA greater risk of theft; space limitations; safety; and aesthetics. Six materials (i.e., concrete/asphalt, metal, rubber, thermoplastic, composite, and wood), along with their commercially available products, were evaluated based on their structural performance, long-term durability, adaptability, life cycle cost, aesthetics, and safety and accessibility of transit riders with mobility devices. Out of the six materials, plastic lumber and metal were found to have the highest potential to replace the conventional design. The plastic lumber presents the most viable option but the metallic materials, even though more expensive, have more potential for quicker installation, which can benefit transit agencies with anticipated frequent route changes. Additionally, the designs of each material option were proposed and recommended for further investigation.

Analysis of Movable Bus Stop Boarding and Alighting Area