Perverse Incentives in the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit
Author(s) -
David McAdams,
Michael Schwarz
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
inquiry the journal of health care organization provision and financing
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.792
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1945-7243
pISSN - 0046-9580
DOI - 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_44.2.157
Subject(s) - formulary , incentive , prescription drug , medical prescription , business , medicare part d , drug , actuarial science , quality (philosophy) , diversity (politics) , pharmacy , public economics , risk analysis (engineering) , economics , medicine , pharmacology , family medicine , microeconomics , political science , law , philosophy , epistemology
This paper analyzes some of the perverse incentives that may arise under the current Medicare prescription drug benefit design. In particular, risk adjustment for a stand-alone prescription drug benefit creates perverse incentives for prescription drug plans when making coverage decisions and/or for pharmaceutical companies when setting prices. This problem is new in that it does not arise with risk adjustment for other types of health care coverage. For this and other reasons, Medicare's drug benefit requires especially close regulatory oversight, now and in the future. We also consider a relatively minor change in financing the benefit that could lead to significant changes in how the benefit functions. In particular, if all plans were required to charge the same premium, there would be less diversity in quality, but also less need to regulate formulary composition, less budgetary uncertainty, and less upward pressure on drug prices.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom