English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The category of minority is used as argumentative reinforcement in Law for the defense of fundamental rights. It is destined to groups that were historically marginalized, and claim for public recognition of their peculiarities and the protection of rights. This category, which appeared linked to the idea of state sovereignty and nationality, now is extended to demands ignored before. The interpretation of principles related to the minority category must therefore be conceived as a need for consolidation of constitutional democratic values. This study aims to identify how the minority category is articulated in decisions of the judiciary. The source of precedents on which research is developed are those decisions of all instances of the Brazilian courts, tried and published since October 5, 1988 until July 31, 2010. The conclusion is that the use of minority category by the judges pursues the democratic ideal of law enforcement to those belonging to minority groups.

<b>Direito das Minorias Interpretado: o compromisso democrático do direito brasileiro</b> <br>doi: 10.5007/2177-7055.2011v32n63p319