English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The starting point for the present article is Itamaraty’s ongoing campaign for a permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council. The aim is to identify the rationale contained in pronouncements of policymakers and officials of Brazilian government. After identifying legal arguments as the cornerstone of the campaign, the authors discuss the relevance of Law in the only precedent so far regarding the change in the permanent composition of the Security Council: the Chinese representation affair, which took place between 1949 and 1979. The analysis of such events indicates that the motivations for changes were not of legal nature; they were rather due not only in virtue of power framework of the international scenario at the time, but also to the weight reached by (continental) China in the late sixties and early seventies. Thus, the authors identify power politics as pivotal in the changes in the core of the UNSC in that particular case and point out that the vulnerability of crafting such campaign on legal grounds.

Retórica jurídica e poder: uma análise da campanha do Itamaraty por assento permanente no Conselho de Segurança da ONU