English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare extractionsocket healing and alveolar ridge preservation using autogenousbone covered with connective tissue graft (CT) or acellulardermal matrix (ADM).Materials and methods: Sixteen nonsmoking, healthy patientswith 18 nonmolar teeth requiring extraction participated inthe study. Following extraction, the sockets were debrided,measured, and grafted with autogenous bone, then coveredwith either CT or ADM. Measurements of alveolar ridge widthand height were made at baseline and after 16 to 20 weekspost extraction. Soft and hard tissue biopsies of the extractionsites were evaluated histomorphometrically.Results: The mean buccolingual ridge width loss was0.19 mm for both CT and ADM groups. The mean vertical bonegain was 1.08 mm bone for the CT group and 0.82 mm forthe ADM group. Histologic evaluation revealed a mean bonefill of 40.67 and 50.76% for CT and ADM group respectively.Student t-tests did not reveal significant difference betweenthe two groups.Conclusion: The overall results of the study suggest that theuse of bone graft covered with either CT or ADM is useful forridge preservation.

Ridge Preservation using Dermis Allograft Tissue Matrix Membrane vs Connective Tissue Graft