English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Given the growing use of both thrombelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in trauma and surgery, it is important to determine whether the two are interchangeable, and how comparable they are to Clauss fibrinogen assay and for clinical use. We recently completed a randomized control trial on early fibrinogen in trauma (the FiiRST trial). The object of this analysis was to evaluate the interchangeability and correlations between TEG and ROTEM functional fibrinogen assays in injured trauma patients. Also, we evaluated their correlation with Clauss fibrinogen and compared their potentials for diagnosis of coagulopathy and use in guided fibrinogen administration.

A Comparative Analysis of Functional Fibrinogen Assays using TEG and ROTEM in Trauma Patients Enrolled in the FiiRST Trial