English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Ab s t r Ac t Background: An endodontic management of the primary teeth is important considering the various untoward consequences associated with its premature loss. Aim: To compare the patient acceptability with manual and rotary methods of root canal instrumentation during pulpectomy. Materials and methods: Pulpectomy treatment was carried out in 60 pulpally infected the primary teeth among children aged 4–7 years. Thirty teeth were instrumented with manual and rotary methods of root canal instrumentation. Patient acceptability during instrumentation was recorded by an independent evaluator using a modified patient acceptability scale. Results: Children accept treatment readily with manual technique; however, no statistically significant difference was observed between manual and rotary techniques of root canal instrumentation. Conclusion: Acceptability of root canal instrumentation in children is comparable with manual and rotary techniques.

Patient Acceptability of Manual and Rotary Techniques for Instrumentation of Root Canal in Primary Teeth