English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Materials and methods: For an in vitro study, specimens were prepared and divided into two equal groups. Group I (control group) specimens were lined with soft liner and left uncoated and group II (treated group) specimens were lined with soft liner and were coated by surface conditioning agent. For an in vivo study, 20 patients were selected and divided into two groups. Group I (control group) patients wore denture lined with uncoated soft liner, whereas group II (treated group) patients wore denture lined with soft liner and coated with surface conditioning agent. Soft liners lining the specimens and dentures were then examined for softness with a durometer and for surface integrity with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at the baseline and after 1, 2, and 3 weeks.

Effect of Surface Treatment on Longevity of Soft Liners: Anin vitroandin vivoStudy