English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The traditional concept that brain damage is caused during birth or early neonatal period has been challenged. This is sup­ ported by the fact that the incidence of cerebral palsy stayed unchanged despite the global increase of cesarean sections. Consequently, the medicolegal importance of fetal neuro­ logical research is essential and needed. Years of research have provided us with important knowledge about asso ciation of fetal movements with brain development. The basic studies were done by two­dimensional ultrasound. The implementation of four­dimensional ultrasound in evaluation of fetal behavior has opened new and unexplored possibilities of evaluating the quality of fetal movements and a detailed assessment of fetal facial expressions. It is known that early postnatal neurological assessment, regarding future prediction of neurological opti­ mality, has great limitations do to wonderful brain plasticity. Taking this very important limitation in to the account we could conclude that the preliminary studies comparing prenatal and postnatal neurological assessment are comparable. More importantly they emphasize the fact that the study of fetal behavior is most probably the right path in the study of fetal neurological development.

Is in utero Fetal Neurological Assessment Comparable to Postnatal Neurological Assessment?