English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objectives: To detect and compare the sensitivity and specificity of downstaging and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and withLugols iodine (VILI).Methods: Screening with downstaging, VIA and VILI were done on 680 women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria at a primary health centerattached to the university hospital, over a period of one year. Those who had abnormal results in downstaging, VIA and VILI were biopsiedand sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value were calculated.Results: The sensitivities of downstaging, VIA and VILI were 54.55, 63.64 and 90.91% and specificities were 93.42, 95.07 and 97.46%respectively. The positive predictive value of downstaging, VIA and VILI were 12.01, 17.5 and 35.7% and negative predictive values were99.2, 99.37 and 98.85% respectively.Conclusion: VIA and VILI are suitable primary screening procedures as compared to downstaging because of high sensitivity and specificity.The negative predictive value of downstaging, VIA and VILI is better than the positive predictive value. Downstaging can be used in ruralareas where acetic acid and Lugols iodine are not available.

Evaluation of Downstaging, Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and Lugol's Iodine in Screening of Cervical Cancer