English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

1Department of Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences (SGPGIMS), Lucknow-226014, India; 2Centre for Rheumatology, Calicut, Kerala, India Plagiarism is a great masquerade. Detecting plagiarism is daunting even for experienced reviewers and editors.1,2 Plagiarism constitutes scienti c misconduct by violating the intellectual property rights of the creators of such content.3 Literature suggests that up to a sixth of manuscripts submitted to journals might be affected by plagiarism.4 Through this editorial, we share our perspectives on how to identify and manage instances of suspected plagiarism in manuscripts submitted to journals for publication.

Detecting and Handling Suspected Plagiarism in Submitted Manuscripts