English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

As established in urban morphology, urban form consists of elements  e.g. buildings, plots and streets (Conzen, 1960; Kropf, 2009) which apart from their own form and properties, establish a certain relationship with each other. The space, which is a result of this relationship ecp"dg"fgÝpgf"cu"cp"wtdcp"kpvgthceg."rtqxkfkpi" and maintaining the relationship between two different territories. In this paper, we discuss c" urgekÝe" ecug" qh" cp" wtdcp" kpvgthceg" etgcvgf" as a result of a relationship between a house and a street, which we call the dwelling-street interface (following the naming convention introduced in Palaiologou et al., 2016). The concept of the dwelling-street interface was widely discussed as an important element for maintaining liveability in the street, maintaining important relationships between inhabitants and strangers and enabling individuals to exercise control over the privatepublic boundary and the way they transition between those two territories (Whitehand et al., 1999; Brown et al., 1998; Skjaeveland and Garling, 1997; Lawrence, 1987; Gehl, 1986; Jacobs, 1961, Palaiologou et al., 2016). Even though the importance of the urban interface is discussed there are very few morphological Abstract. In this paper we investigate incremental changes to the relationship between private and public territory on the micro-morphological scale of the dwelling-street interface. This interface lies on the edge between two distinctively different spatial domains, the house and the street, and provides a buffer which may be adjusted to aid the transition from private to public vgttkvqt{0" Vjg" uvtwevwtg" qh" vjg" urceg" korcevu" dqvj" fqockpu<" kv" rtqxkfgu" c" Ýv" transition from the private dwelling to the public territory, creates a space for probabilistic encounters between inhabitants and strangers, and maintains the liveability of the public street. The aim of this paper is threefold: Firstly, we recognise morphological differences in the structure of the interfaces and the way the transition from private to public territory was envisioned and designed in different societal periods. Secondly, we study incremental changes to the interface, representing individual adjustments to the private-public boundary, in order to recognise common types of adaptations to the existing structure of the interface. The history of changes to each individual building and building-street interface was traced by analysing planning applications and enforcements publicly provided by the city council. Lastly, we compare the capacity of each dwelling-street interface to accommodate incremental change to the public-private transition. We argue that studying the incremental change of the interface and the capacity of each interface to accommodate micro-scale transformations aids in the understanding of the complex social relationship between an individual and a collective in the urban environment.

Between territories: Incremental changes to the domestic spatial interface between private and public domains