English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The presented paper focuses on the architectural structure of Viennas Gründerzeit GZ areas, a rigid urban grid structure that emerged in the period between 1848 and 1918, when cp" gpqtoqwu" kpÞwz" qh" pgy" tgukfgpvu" ocfg" Viennas population grow from 440,000 to 2,2 Million, thus making itby that time vjg" Ýhvj/nctiguv" ekv{" kp" vjg" yqtnf0" Fgurkvg" dwu{" eqpuvtwevkqp" cevkxkv{" *fwg" vq" ukipkÝecpv" population increase in resent time), buildings and tracts from this epoch still make up a large portion of the Viennese cityscape. By ceewtcvgn{" cpcn{ukpi" vjg" ÝgnfÓu" vgevqpke" cpf" social fabric and by mutually aligning the historic and the today status, conclusions are drawn that will generate a solid and detailed knowledge of its current architectural form and systemic potential. There is a strong and direct relationship between street space and structure and use of vjg" dwknfkpiuÓ" itqwpf" Þqqtu0 In addressing urban-development issues, it certainly is necessary to consider the totality of the urban parterre as a consistent urban zone of public, semi-public and private spaces. The concept of the StadtParterre therefore includes both builtup and non-built-up areas; it covers the street as well as the adjacent houses and courtyards. Abstract. As proven in the preceding pilot study the historical Viennese StadtParterre (urban parterre) originally presented an extensive, intriguing pgvyqtm"qh"kpvgtkqt"cpf"gzvgtkqt"wtdcp"urcegu<"uvtggvu."dwknfkpi"itqwpf"Þqqtu" and courtyards. It included an essential semi-public sphere with no clear-cut boundary between inside and out. Rather, doors and windows were left open oquv" qh" vjg" vkog" uq" vjcv" itqwpf/Þqqt" rtgokugu"ygtg" gcukn{" ceeguukdng" vq" vjg" Òrwdnke"ÞqyÓ0"Qtkikpcn"rjqvqu"htqo"vjg"rgtkqf"cvvguv"vq"vjku<"vjg"itqwpf/Þqqt"hccades were permeable semi-public or private uses extended from the interior out to the street, and conversely. In addition, many of these so called GewöldgÓ"ygtg"eqppgevgf"ykvj"dcugogpv"Þqqtu"qt"egnnctu"wpfgtpgcvj."yjkej"ogcpv" a further extension of the urban parterre and in most cases the (commercial) use of the street-facing premises also included the interior courtyard. Today, courtyards within the Viennese Gründerzeit areas mostly accommodate garbage cans or dumpsters; their soils are sealed and a considerable part of the urban rctvgttg"nkgu"kfng0"Kpvgpukxg."fkxgtukÝgf"wug"pqycfc{u"ku"tctg<"uvtggv."itqwpf"Þqor and courtyardall being different parts of one essential urban systemare not mutually supportive, their interlinked use-pattern falls apart and diverges. The paper discusses reasons and socio-urban effects of such a dis-linked, malfunctioning urban parterre structure by among others comparing it to the original historic state. First and foremost, though, it debates to acknowledge the ukipkÝecpeg"qh"vjg"UvcfvRctvgttg"hqt"vjg"hwpevkqpkpi"qh"c"ekv{Ïc"hcev"vjcv"jcu" somewhat fallen into oblivion lately.

The loss of semi-public spheres within the Vienna urban parterre system—cause and effect study