English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Event-related potential (ERP) and reaction time (RT) were recorded to investigate the time course of processes involved in set switching. The cued set-switching paradigm required participants to switch stimulus task sets between male and female face-images memorized as targets prior to a trial block and response task sets between two stimulus-response mappings for each stimulus task. Replicating previous findings, an RT switch-cost was found when compared with set-repeat trials. The RT was also prolonged for a stimulus task requirement of memory comparison with two-face targets rather than one face. A similar prolongation with memory comparison was observed in P3b latency, which showed no switch effect. The switch effect was observed for the onset latency of stimulus-locked lateralized readiness potential (LRP), measured as an index of commencement of motor processes after response selection. The response-locked LRP indicated that the final process of motor execution itself was not modified by set switching. The processes producing the stimulus-locked LRP switch cost, associated with response task set, were discussed in terms of two hypotheses, exogenous reconfiguration and carryover.

Stimulus set and response set in task switching: A comparison using ERP