English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Using a conditioned suppression paradigm, differential conditioning between short (S, 0.7 s) and long (L, 4.9 s) US was studied in five groups of rats where the mean intervals between transition (S--&gt;L, L--&gt;S) and between nontransition (S--&gt;S, L--&gt;L) were varied across groups. Group ITI-S was trained with the short intervals in either case, while Group ITI-L was with the long intervals. Group Medium was trained with the intermediate intervals in either case. Group Trns-S had the short intervals between transition and the long intervals between non-transition. For Group Trns-L, these relations was just reversed. The greater differentiations were obtained in Groups ITI-L and Trns-L which had the long inter-transitional intervals. The figures of the differentiations were quite similar in two groups which had the same inter-transitional intervals despite of their mean intertrial or nontransitional intervals. These results suggest that the inter-transitional interval rather than intertrial interval plays a critical role for the trial-distribution effects in a differential conditioning of US duration.

Differentinl conditioning of US duration in rats: The effects of intertrnnsitional interval.