English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In Philosophical Fragments, Kierkegaard’s pseudonym Johannes Climacus presents socratic pathos and instant pathos as the basis of different kinds of thought: the thought of philosophical tradition and the thought that the pseud- onym assumes as its own. This article will recall and characterize these different pathos as illustrated pathos and christian pathos, respectively. It will also recall the approach of Bataille and Kierkegaard as exemplar authors of each kind of thought. Our aim is to feature them as representative and ultimate examples of each kind of pathos and thus, of doing philosophy, more than trying to convey specific coincidences or differences between both authors.

Phatos a ultranza: Una lectura de Kierkegaard y Bataille