English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

In the article “Carl Ginzburg’s historiographic battle: read against the grain the inquisitorial acts of the benandanti”, from the analysis of his first work, Los benandanti (1966), I show that the historiography of Carlo Ginzburg has positioned itself on the side of the persecuted inquisitors. This argument is composed of three moments: 1) the analysis of historiographic and intellectual production of the work; 2) the exposition of how the beliefs of the Benandanti, an agrarian cult of the 16th and 17th century in the region of Friuli, were forced to adjust into the inquisitorial schemes of witchcraft; and 3) how the gesture of brushing the inquisitorial acts against the grain in the involuntary revelations, based on Walter Benjamin and Marc Bloch, made it possible for Ginzburg to combat the barbarity of the inquisitorial acts and their process of transmission, and thus to make room for the emergence of a deeper history of a wider set of traditions.

La batalla historiográfica de Carlo Ginzburg: leer a contrapelo las actas inquisitoriales de los benandanti