English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Learning specialized computer skills necessitates using the computer as a problem-solving tool while displaying superior affective skills in an applied learning environment. Motivational Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) motivation scale assesses students’ general motivation to learn, but does not capture students’ motivation and use of effective learning strategies in an applied learning environment. To better understand the difference (or lack of difference) in students’ motivation to engage in problem-based learning, a valid instrument is needed. Exploratory factor analyses and confirmatory factor analyses showed that the survey items did not confirm to the original Motivation and Learning Strategies scales. The refined Motivation section consisted of 24 items in three scales: Expectancy, Task Value, and Test Anxiety. The refined Learning Strategies section consisted of 25 items in four scales: Effort Regulation, Organization, Critical Thinking, and General Strategies for Learning.

MSLQ: INSTRUMENT VALIDATION OF MOTIVATION AND LEARNING STRATEGIES FOR ACQUIRING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATION SKILLS