English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study seeks to evaluate the current state of online educational delivery and assess the perception of the these six issues—quality, rigor, engagement, retention, discussion component, and critical thinking—as well as acceptance of online education courses credits compared to the traditional face-to-face academic model. A survey instrument was distributed to over 500 faculty, university administrators, and students to solicit their feedback towards current practices, attitudes, and beliefs about online courses. This study found that most faculty, administrator, and students perceived online education to be inferior as compared to face-to-face delivery in six different areas. Furthermore, most faculty indicated an acceptance of online course credit for prerequisite traditional face-to-face undergraduate and graduate offerings. However, many faculty reported that online courses should not be replacement for face-toface in one’s major field of study.

PERCEPTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF ONLINE EDUCATION: DO ONLINE COURSES PASS THE MUSTER?