English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This focus of this study was to identify appropriate penalties for situations involving academic dishonesty (cheating) as perceived by college student. A secondary purpose was to document any differences in perceptions based on class level. A total of 266 students in introductory information systems courses completed an 18-item instrument at the end of the college semester. Results of the study revealed that the penalties perceived as appropriate for cheating differ among freshman, sophomores, and upper classmen (juniors and seniors). Areas of further research are suggested.

APPROPRIATE PENALTIES FOR ACADEMIC DISHONESTY AS PERCEIVED BY STUDENTS IN AN INFORMATION SYSTEMS CLASS: AN ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL