English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Academic institutions and research funders have in the last decade devoted considerable effort to developing policies to support academic integrity and prevent misconduct. In this study, we consider the extent to which various initiatives of Canadian federal and provincial (Quebec) funders have affected the development of institutional research integrity/misconduct (RIM) policies. Examining the creation and modification dates of 32 institutional RIM policies, we find that federal but not provincial initiatives appear to have the greatest impact on the development of RIM policies. Idiosyncrasies in the creation dates, as well as lack of evidence of a systematic pattern in modification dates, suggest a complex system that is often insulated from certain government initiatives. These results lead us to conclude that there should be greater consistency in the development or updating of RIM policies to ensure the appropriate treatment of misconduct and to encourage behaviour that meets the highest standards of research integrity. Resume Au cours de la derniere decennie, les institutions academiques et les bailleurs de fonds de recherche ont consacre beaucoup d’efforts a l’elaboration de politiques pour soutenir l’integrite scientifique et prevenir les inconduites en recherche. Dans la presente etude, nous analysons dans quelle mesure les diverses initiatives des bailleurs de fonds canadiens, tant federaux que provinciaux (Quebec), ont affecte l’elaboration de politiques institutionnelles sur l’integrite et les inconduites en recherche (IIR). En examinant les dates de creation et de modification de 32 politiques institutionnelles sur l’IIR, nous constatons que ce sont les initiatives federales, et non provinciales, qui semblent avoir le plus grand effet sur l’elaboration de politiques. Des idiosyncrasies dans les dates de creation, ainsi que l’absence de preuves d’un modele systematique de dates de modification, suggerent un systeme complexe, souvent isole de certaines initiatives gouvernementales. Ces resultats nous amenent a conclure qu’il devrait y avoir une plus grande coherence dans l’elaboration ou la mise a jour de politiques sur l’IIR pour assurer le traitement approprie des inconduites et encourager un comportement qui repond aux normes les plus elevees d’integrite en recherche.

canadian journal of higher education

Early Contributions to the Evolution of the Canadian Scientific Integrity System: Institutional and Governmental Interaction in the Policy Diffusion Process