English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

La modernidad nos dejo como legado el descubrimiento de la subjetividad y una concepcion mecanicista del cuerpo humano. Asi, diferentes filosofos de la escuela fenomenologica han conservado el patrimonio de la subjetividad y han trabajado para superar el dualismo cartesiano. Sin embargo, los avances filosoficos por multiples razones no siempre fecundan en el campo pedagogico, de modo que es fundamental promover una constante reflexion filosofica en el contexto de la Educacion Fisica. Por esa razon, se ha desarrollado este ensayo que tiene por objetivo analizar la perspectiva del cuerpo humano en la corriente fenomenologica alemana del siglo XX, en concreto, en las ideas de Edmund Husserl, Max Scheler y Edith Stein. Por medio del estudio de sus diferentes obras, se puede mencionar que hay un concepto clave en sus ideas, que es el del cuerpo vivo. Este cuerpo expresaria el espiritu o el sujeto encarnado, que experimenta la realidad a traves de su ser psicofisico. Entonces, el ser humano tendria en todas sus experiencias un cuerpo vivo pero, a su vez, tambien fisico o material. Por consiguiente, de este analisis se concluye que para superar la concepcion mecanicista del cuerpo en la Educacion Fisica, no es necesario cambiar el nombre a dicha disciplina pedagogica, sino comprender que la materia del ser humano es inseparable de su subjetividad. Abstract: Modernity left us the discovery of subjectivity and a mechanistic conception of the human body as a legacy. Thus, different philosophers of the phenomenological school have preserved the patrimony of subjectivity and have worked to overcome the Cartesian dualism. However, philosophical advances do not always fertilize the pedagogical field for many reasons, so it is essential to promote a constant philosophical reflection in the context of Physical Education. For this reason, this essay has been developed with the aim to analyze the perspective of the human body in the German phenomenological stream of the 20th century, in particular, in the ideas of Edmund Husserl, Max Scheler, and Edith Stein. Through the study of their different works, it can be mentioned that there is a key concept in their ideas, i.e. the living body. This body would express the spirit or the embodied subject, who experiences reality through his/her psychophysical being. Then, the human being would have, in all his/her experiences, a living body, but also physical or material. Therefore, from this analysis it is concluded that to overcome the mechanistic conception of the body in Physical Education, it is not necessary to change the name of said pedagogical discipline, but to understand that the human being's matter is inseparable from its subjectivity.

retos digital/retos

El término Educación Física en la postmodernidad: contribución de algunas perspectivas fenomenológicas (The term Physical Education in postmodernity: contribution of some phenomenological perspectives)