English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

El objetivo fue comprobar si la modalidad de juego 3vs.3, en comparacion con la 5vs.5 en baloncesto extraescolar jugado por ninos de entre 9 y 11 anos, favorecio un aumento de: (a) numero de posesiones de balon, (b) numero de pases, (c) eficacia en las posesiones, (d) disfrute, (e) competencia percibida, (f) intencion de practica futura, (g) emociones positivas, y (h) preferencia de los participantes. Comenzaron participando 42 ninos (M = 9.89, DT = .832), pero debido a los criterios de inclusion exigidos, los participantes finales fueron 18. Se utilizo la metodologia observacional mediante un diseno nomotetico, puntual y multidimensional, con un muestreo temporal por puntos de tiempo para evaluar las dos modalidades de juego (5vs.5 y 3vs.3). Los datos se obtuvieron a traves de la filmacion de los mini-partidos y su respectiva observacion (numero de posesiones de balon, numero de pases y eficacia de las posesiones), empleando cuestionarios (disfrute, competencia percibida, intencion de practica futura y estado emocional), y a traves de dos preguntas ad hoc por escrito (preferencia de los participantes). Los resultados mostraron valores mas elevados a favor de la modalidad 3vs.3 en: (a) numero de posesiones de balon, (b) numero de pases, (c) eficacia de las posesiones, (d) emociones positivas, (e) emociones neutras y (f) preferencia de los participantes. Para favorecer la implicacion en el juego, una practica de calidad, las emociones positivas, y a la vez satisfacer las preferencias de los ninos, se deberia optar por la modalidad de juego 3vs.3.The purpose of the study was to know whether the 3vs.3 game form in comparison to the 5vs.5 game form in under-11 extra scholar basketball let an increase in: (a) number of ball possessions, (b) number of passes, (c) efficacy of the possessions, (d) enjoyment, (e) perceived competence, (f) intention to be physically active, (g) positive emotions, and (h) preference of the participants. Forty-two boys were involved in the study, but only 18 ended their participation due to the inclusion criteria. The observational methodology was used throughout a nomothetic, point, and multidimensional design type. The sample technique to assess the two game forms (5vs.5 and 3vs.3) was temporary by time points. Data were collected observing the videos of the matches (number of ball possessions, number of passes, efficacy of the possessions), using questioners (enjoyment, perceived competence, intention to be physically active, positive emotions), and two ad hoc written questions (preference of the participants). The results showed higher values in the 3vs.3 game form in comparison to the 5vs.5 game form in: (a) number of ball possessions, (b) number of passes, (c) efficacy of the possessions, (e) positive emotions, and (f) preference of the participants. The 3vs.3 game form should be used to favour players’ game implication, successful participation, positive emotions, as well as, to satisfy their preferences.

retos digital/retos

Efecto de la modalidad de juego en baloncesto (5vs.5 y 3vs.3) sobre conductas motrices y psicológicas en alumnado de 9-11 años (Effect of game form (5vs.5 and 3vs.3) on motor and psychological behaviours in under-11 basketball)