English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The results of this study indicate. (1) It can be seen that the amount of the adjusted R square value is 0.632 or 63.2%. This shows that the Work Discipline Variable (X1) and the Work Motivation Variable (X2) can explain the Medical Personnel Performance Variable (Y) of 63.2 %, the remaining 36.8% (100% - 63.2%) is explained by other variables outside this research model. (2) The results of the t test (partial) show that t count (8,211)&gt; t table (1.685), as well as the significance value of 0.00  ttable (1.685), and the significance value is 0.202&gt; 0.05, it can be concluded that the second hypothesis is rejected, meaning that the Work Motivation Variable (X2) has no significant effect on Medical Personnel Performance Variable (Y). (4) The results of the simultaneous test (F) show that the Ftable value is 3.22. From the description, it can be seen that Fcount (34.461)&gt; Ftable (3.25), and a significance value of 0.00 &lt;0.05, it can be concluded The third hypothesis is accepted, meaning that the Work Discipline Variable (X1), Work Motivation Variable (X2) have a significant effect simultaneously (simultaneously) on the Performance Variable of Medical Personnel (Y).

The Effect of Work Discipline and Work Motivation on the Performance of Medical Personnel