English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Aim: The aim of this research work is to determine the presence of hyperthyroidism using modern algorithms, and comparing the accuracy rate between deep learning algorithms and vivo monitoring. Materials and methods: Data collection containing ultrasound images from kaggle's website was used in this research. Samples were considered as (N=23) for Deep learning algorithm and (N=23) for vivo monitoring in accordance to total sample size calculated using clinical.com. The accuracy was calculated by using DPLA with a standard data set. Results: Comparison of accuracy rate is done by independent sample test using SPSS software. There is a statistically indifference between Deep learning algorithm and in vivo monitoring. Deep learning algorithm (87.89%) showed better results in comparison to vivo monitoring (83.32%). Conclusion: Deep learning algorithms appear to give better accuracy than in vivo monitoring to predict hyperthyroidism.

Comparison and Prediction of Hyperthyroidism Accuracy Rate Using Novel Deep Learning Technology and Vivo Monitoring