English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Philosophy of technology was not initially considered a  consolidated fi eld of inquiry. However, under the infl uence of sociology and pragmatist philosophy, something resembling a consensus has emerged in a fi eld previously marked by a lack of agreement amongst its practitioners. Th is has given the fi eld a  greater sense of structure and yielded interesting research. However, the loss of the earlier “messy” state has resulted in a  limitation of the fi eld’s scope and methodology that precludes an encompassing view of the problematic issues inherent in the question of technology. It is argued that the heterodox disunity and diversity of earlier philosophy of technology was not a mark of theoretical immaturity but was necessitated by the fi eld’s complex subject matter. It is further argued that philosophy of technology should return to its pluralistic role as a  meta-analytical structure linking insights from diff erent fi elds of research.

A Manifesto for Messy Philosophy of Technology: The History and Future of an Academic Field