English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article aims to use the methodology of legal pragmatism in justifying decision making by the applicator of the anti-elision rule, contained in the paragraph of article 116 of the National Tax Code, especially after the introduction of article 20 in the Law of Introduction to the Rules of Brazilian Law. For this purpose, a bibliographic research was conducted in order to undertake a relationship between the legal-philosophical method proposed by Pragmatism and the meaning and scope of art. 20 of the LINDB and art. 116 from CTN.

O Pragmatismo Jurídico como Método Argumentativo de Justificação da Tomada de Decisão pelo Aplicador da Norma Geral Antielisiva