English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Building works often imply the need for archaeological activities. In this article it is examined if those activities should be undertaken and financed by the promoters of the works or by the Public Administration. The solution which was reached by the state and regional legislation is exposed. It is emphasized that regional legislation deviates significantly from the provisions of state legislation and, at the same time, reveals many differences between them. The differences are aggravated by the interference of the urban development plan, administrative practices and the various interpretations of the courts. The resulting system is criticized and proposals for changes are made, so that state legislation might guarantee a minimum of equality and rationality of the system.

Las actuaciones arqueológicas ante la realización de obras