English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

A comparison between two of the most used scintillation models and experimental data is presented. The experimental&#13; data have been derived from a GPS scintillation monitor developed at Cornell University and placed in Tucuman&#13; (Argentina), under the peak of the anomaly. The models used (GISM and WBMOD) have been run for the&#13; geophysical conditions corresponding to the measurements. The comparison is done by subdividing the information&#13; on the basis of an ionospheric grid of 5°×5° surface square boxes. The comparison has been performed for&#13; several local times, from 18 LT until 04 LT. Here, only a few cases of particular interest are shown. The goal is to&#13; understand if the models are able to forecast actual scintillation morphology (from the satellite navigation systems&#13; point of view) and if they could be used to yield an estimate of scintillation effects on satellite navigation systems

Comparison of ionospheric scintillation models with experimental data for satellite navigation applications