English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The interface between intellectual property law and competition law is complicated. The interaction between prohibited abuse of market power under EU competition law and national intellectual property rights has been a perennial issue for courts on both the EU and the member state level. The issue became even more complicated by the ongoing standardisation movement which raised concerns about the anti-competitive nature of standardisation agreements and possible implications for compulsory licensing. The practical question was the availability of injunctive relief for infringements of patents that are essential to an established market standard. In July 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union put an end to simmering conflict between the European Commission and German patent litigation courts. The new ruling Huawei ./.ZTE is ground breaking and transcends the borders of competition law, partially harmonising patent litigation practice in Europe.

Huawei ./. ZTE, or, how the CJEU closed the Orange Book