English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The conceptualisation of gambling-related harm is saliently driven by whether gambling is regulated from the perspective of public health or from the paradigm of economic considerations. The scope of what consequences are attributed to gambling and how they are measured determines how those issues are treated within any given jurisdictions and to what extent they are regulated. The vast majority of individuals are able to live around and even participate in gambling and gambling-type activities without suffering any negative longor short-term consequences. Unlike smoking, which has been recognised to cause some harm with even only one cigarette,1 gambling participation may constitute an exciting and harmless entertainment that may even enhance the personal well-being of those who enjoy it.2 Gambling participation has been attributed to helping the elderly to minimise effects of some degenerative illnesses such as for example, Alzheimer’s or dementia.3 It may benefit some players by teaching them how to cope better with difficulties by building social networks and avoiding loneliness through developing companionships. Bingo in particular has been claimed to help with the improvement of concentration and short-term memory.4 It may

The concept of vulnerability and gambling-related harm