English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Before one can commence the analysis of constraints on regulatory autonomy resulting from obligations applicable to the EU in GATS and the services chapters of EU RTAs, it is imperative to explain how these treaties are to be interpreted. In the case of GATS, case law has developed its take on the rules of treaty interpretation extensively. In the case of EU RTAs, despite the dispute settlement mechanisms provided, no disputes have been brought to this day.1 Although there is some guidance in the text of each of the selected agreements, it is submitted that a presumption of WTO consistent interpretation applies to all agreements. Because the objectives of an agreement shed light on the interpretation of its provisions, these are addressed in this chapter as well.

Interpretation of GATS and the selected EU RTAs