Enhancing tuberculosis diagnosis by polymerase chainreaction: an experience at a tertiary hospital
Author(s) -
Fernanda de Paris,
Francine Voigt,
Alice Beatriz Mombach Pinheiro Machado,
Kátia Ruschel Pilger de Oliveira,
Denise Maria Cunha Willers,
Dirce Veloso Mayora,
Rodrigo Minuto Paiva,
Afonso Luís Barth
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
clinical and biomedical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2357-9730
DOI - 10.4322/2357-9730.61295
Subject(s) - sputum , tuberculosis , medicine , polymerase chain reaction , nontuberculous mycobacteria , acid fast , mycobacterium tuberculosis , veterinary medicine , gastroenterology , pathology , mycobacterium , biology , gene , biochemistry
Tuberculosis (TB) persists as a severe global public health issue. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the performance of an in-house TB PCR (polymerase chain reaction) in sputum. Methods: DNA from sputum specimens were submitted to a nested-PCR protocol for the IS6110 region detection. PCR results were compared to those of the traditional methods for TB diagnosis, i.e., acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy and culture. We analyzed sputum samples obtained from 133 patients. Results: A total of 48 (36%) cultures yielded indeterminate results due to contamination. This high contamination rate may be explained by the fact that samples from fibrocystic patients were included in this study. Additionally, other five samples were positive for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). Therefore, it was possible to compare 80 patients for M. tuberculosis detection. We found 14 positive samples: five presented positive results in the three methods (5/14; 35.7%), two were positive in culture and PCR (2/14; 14.3%), one was positive in AFB and PCR (1/14; 7.1%), five were positive only in PCR (5/14; 35.7%) and 1 was positive only in culture (1/14; 7.1%). Thus, positivity rates for each technique were: 7.5% for AFB (6/80), 10% for culture (8/80) and 16.25% for PCR (13/80). Among the 48 patients who had indeterminate results in sputum culture, two samples were positive in PCR. Conclusion: Considering the limitations of the traditional methods, the use of PCR as a molecular technique could be advantageous for TB diagnosis.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom