English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Critical inquiry has been adopted by various academic disciplines. However, there is a\udlack of consistency and transparency in the way this complex theoretical and methodological position is applied\udin research. For novice researchers that ambiguity can lead to blurring the conceptual distinction between critical\udresearch and the act of criticizing. Objective: The purpose of this essay is to reflect on what it means to keep a\udcritical perspective for novice researchers. Method: The concepts are explored through a personal narrative that\udallows authors to examine the details of their trajectory to embrace a critical perspective, which has the power\udto lead to change, both personal and social. Results: We explore the methodological foundations of the critical\udresearch and observe how the emotion is taken over or suppressed in the investigation process. Conclusion: We\udcontextualize key concepts of critical investigation, examining its recent application both in occupational science\udand in occupational therapy

CAN CRITICAL INQUIRY DIFFER FROM CRITICISM? A DIALOGUE WITH CURRENT OCCUPATIONAL SCIENCE AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SCHOOLS OF INQUIRY