English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

espanolLa dermatitis de contacto aerotransportada (DCAT), es una forma de dermatitis profesional que por su manifestacion clinica, localizacion y forma de contacto presentan caracteristica propias, este hecho junto con la relevancia de la dermatosis dentro de la morbilidad profesional justifica la necesidad de sintetizar la evidencia cientifica existente mediante una revision sistematica. Objetivos: Identificar la evidencia cientifica sobre la DCAT, la existencia de un consenso sobre criterios diagnosticos, las medidas de prevencion y la identificacion de poblacion especialmente sensible. Material y metodos: Revision sistematica de la produccion cientifica publicada entre 2006 y 20014 sobre DCAT, se realizo una busqueda sistematica mediante terminos DeCS, MeSH, en diversas bases de datos y otros recursos informaticos (MEDLINE, COCHRANE, SCOPUS, SCIELO, OVID, BNCS, OSH, UPDATE). La evidencia se evaluo con los criterios SIGN. Resultados: Tras el proceso de seleccion el resultado final fue de 15 articulos a analizar del total recuperado de 504. Los tipos de diseno: 1 Ensayo Clinico no aleatorizado sin grupo control y 14 Series de Casos, de los cuales 7 usaron grupo control. Las sustancias quimicas que produjeron DCAT no publicadas previamente fueron: TFA, fibras PP y PE, Dihidrocloruro 2 2'-azobis (2-metilpropanamida) y HBTU ¹; y los farmacos: Tilosina, Pristinamicina, Carbocromeno y Famotidina. Discusion y conclusiones: La limitacion de los resultados es el bajo nivel de evidencia cientifica de los articulos analizados, lo que compromete su validez externa. Con respecto a las revisiones de Santos R, y Grosens A (2001 al 2006) encuentran 9 casos nuevos de DCAT y Swinnen I, y Grossens A (2007-2011) describen 14 casos. En nuestra revision (2006-2014) hay 6 nuevos casos, lo que reafirma un aumento en el interes del estudio y la trascendencia de esta patologia. No se puede demostrar ninguna poblacion especialmente sensible, se puede concluir que la DCAT esta cobrando importancia, y que se debe mejorar la produccion cientifica con disenos que generen un mayor nivel de evidencia que permitan tomar las medidas preventivas adecuadas. EnglishDue to its location, clinical signs and form of contact, the airborne contact dermatitis (ABCD) is a unique type of occupational dermatitis. It results unquestionable the need of synthetising the scientific evidence through a systematic review taking into account the dermathoses relevance in the occupational morbidity. Objectives: To identify the scientific evidence for ABCD, the existence of a consensus on diagnostic criteria, on preventive measures and on the identification of especially sensitive population. Material and methods: A systematic review of the scientific literature published between 2006 and 2014 about ABCD. A systematic search was performed using DeCS, MeSH, in various databases and other computer resources (MEDLINE, COCHRANE, SCOPUS, SCIELO, OVID, BNCS, OSH, UPDATE). The evidence was evaluated following a SIGN criteria. Results: 15 articles were selected to be analyzed after a selecting process of 504. Types of design: 1-Non-randomized clinical trial without control group and 14 Case Series, 7 of which were using a control group. The ABCD chemicals not previously published: TFA, PP/PE fibers, Ethyl 2 2'- azobis Dihidroclorure (2- methyl propanamide) and HBTU¹, and the drugs: Tylosin, Pristinamycin, Carbocromen and Famotidine. Discussion and conclusions: The limitation of the results reveals the low scientific evidence levels on the analyzed articles, compromising his external validity. Regarding the reviews of Santos R, and Grossens A. (2001-2006), 9 new cases of ABCD were found and Swinnen I, and Grossens A. (2007-2011) described 14 cases. In our review (2006-2014) there are 6 new cases, confirming an increasing interest in this study and the gravity of this disease. As it is impossible to demonstrate a particularly sensitive population, it can be concluded that the ABCD is gaining importance. The scientific production should be improved with designs which generate a higher level of evidence allowing to take preventive measures.

Dermatitis aerotrasportada de origen laboral en la industria química, farmacéutica y sector sanitario