English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objectives: To analyse the assistance procedure to the deceased in a Hospital Emergency Service. Methods: Descriptive retrospective study of the deceased during 2000 analysing the clinic variables, triage times, attentionand total staying, diagnostic tests, treatments as well as the place of decease within the service and the family presence. Results: 146 patients were included, 80.6% of which were catalogued as life urgency (red code), conditioning significantly lower first exploration times than the rest. Diagnose tests were made to the 87%, 40% received resuscitation manoeuvres; finally 75.5% were given some medication. Major analgesia and sedative treatments were mostly employed with cancer patients. 42.2 % die within the first hour and 83% before six hours. Those who die after this time die in the observation box. 31% die accompanied by familiars. Conclusions: Our present "triage" system does not seem to be the adequate to initially evaluate the patients who die at the Emergency Service. Nearly all who die six hours after their entry die in the observation box, accomplishing one of its operation expectatives. We observe a scarce use of palliative treatments. Most of our patients die alone.

¿Son los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios un lugar adecuado para morir?