English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Raw milk samples were diluted with distilled water or distilled water with added phosphate buffer as recommended by Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products. The standard plate counts were higher in diluent without phosphate buffer with both high and low count milk. The higher counts were significant when analyzed by a nonparametric sign test or a t-test of differences but were not significant with an analysis of variance technique. Reproducibility was not statistically different in the two diluents. It is suggested that the use of phosphate buffer for raw milk bacteria counts be discontinued until information showing definite advantages is provided.

A Comparison of Phosphate Buffered and Distilled Water Dilution Blanks for the Standard Plate Count of Raw-Milk Bacteria1