English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article argues that within the system of international law, while Ethiopia’s equitable right of access to resources of the Nile is recognized as a matter of settled principle, the law’s actual working is a coefficient of prior hydraulic measures adopted on the ground rather than mere articulation of legal norms, diplomatic civility or altercations. I also submit that the system of international law still remains vital in resolving transboundary water issues, and yet, the mechanics of law could not function optimally outside of power politic, diplomatic dexterity and sincere commitment to the fundamental values it upholds. In this light, and against a backdrop of Ethiopia’s relegated position in the second half of the twentieth century, the paper concludes that today the country’s relative renaissance in the Nile legal politics - which for the first time captured serious downstream interest in riparian negotiations - is attributed not to a change in the pertinence of the norms of international law nor to any altruistic revision of positions in the lower reaches of the river, but rather to its belated awakening in pursuing the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) as a national project of multifarious impact.

The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and Ethiopia’s Succession in Hydro-legal Prominence: A Script in Legal History of Diplomatic Confront (1957-2013)