English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The protection of property rights involves complementarities between the judiciary, executive organs and administrative tribunals. It envisages a legislative framework and administrative protection based on an administrative procedure law pursued by administrative authorities and tribunals. Moreover, It requires an independent and competent judiciary with due integrity. The judicial protection of private property rights determines the extent to which individuals and legal persons are ensured access, proper interpretation, efficient adjudication and appropriate judgment to their claims, counterclaims and defenses whenever disputes are adjudicated in courts of law. This envisages competence, integrity, efficiency, judicial independence, predictability and consistency in judicial decisions. As an exhaustive analysis on all aspects of these themes requires wider discussion, this comment focuses on the jurisprudence, consistency and predictability of some high level Ethiopian court decisions (particularly at the level of the Cassation Division of the Federal Supreme Court) on selected themes related to private property with a view to highlighting the practical protection of private property rights in Ethiopia.

Judicial Protection of Private Property Rights in Ethiopia: Selected Themes