English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Intellectual and political skepticism about the place of the courts in effecting social transformation is not uncommon. In The Hollow Hope, American scholar Gerald Rosenberg strongly criticised the famous US Supreme Court decision in Brown v Board of Education and asserted that it was nearly impossible to generate significant social reforms through litigation, primarily because courts are relatively ineffective and weak. He also argued that courts pale into significance in comparison with other social and political forces, such as, a reforming parliament, a foresighted Executive or a determined civil society. Just as Hitler asked the Pope: "where are your battalions?" courts lack the financial muscle or the political authority to effect change on their own, thereby attracting a similar kind of cynicism and doubt.

Using courts of law to tackle poverty and social exclusion: The case of post-2010 Kenya