English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Most forensic mental health programmes focus primarily on treating patients' mental illness in much the same way that all psychiatric patients are managed. Risk management is usually presumed to have been accomplished when the patient achieves clinical recovery, which really means remission of illness and compliance with treatment. Not all patients require equal measures of risk management and psychiatric care, nor has it been possible to pursue both seamlessly as part of an overall treatment philosophy, although both seem to involve paternalistic care.

When coercion meets hope: Can forensic psychiatry adopt the recovery model?