English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

摘要 王弼是魏晉玄學最重要的思想家也是中國哲學史上不世出的天才他以二十四歲英年早逝卻無礙於他的哲學成就《周易注》被收入十三經注疏《老子注》則成為通行本影響後世深遠。歷來詮釋王弼思想的成果豐碩精彩論點令人目不暇給對於王弼思想的關注不限於華人社會近期在中國出版德國當代著名漢學家瓦格納 (Rudolf G. Wagner) 《王弼《老子注》研究》就是海外漢學家長期關注王弼哲學的成果。本文針對海峽兩岸研究王弼卓然有成的林麗真、余敦康以及歐陸的瓦格納等三人的王弼《老子注》的研究成果歸納其進路、觀點以及重大創穫。林麗真聚焦於王弼玄理的闡發余敦康則提出通貫哲學與政治整體觀著重王弼玄學的現實關懷瓦格納則從語言哲學入手提出「鍊體風格」的詮釋策略豐富文本的內涵。台灣、大陸與歐洲學者對王弼的詮釋有共識也有殊異這樣的參照比較不僅可以相互攻錯擴大學術視野也能進一步深化王弼思想、魏晉玄學的研究極富學術意義。 關鍵詞王弼老子注歐洲漢學林麗真余敦康瓦格納 Abstract Wang Bi, the most prominent scholar of metaphysics of the Wei and Jin Dynasties, was an unprecedented genius throughout the history of Chinese philosophy. In this article, the author examines the brilliant contributions made by Lin Li Zhen, Yu Dun Kang and Rudolf G. Wagner, who are noticed for their research of Exegesis of Lao-Tzu . It is a synthesis of the directions of investigation, approaches, and significant findings they have come up with. Among the three interpretations, Lin focuses on the explanation of Wang’s metaphysic thinking while Yu emphasizes Wang’s secular concerns by proposing the “philosophy of thoroughness” and political holism. As for Wagner, he approaches this work with the views of linguistic philosophy and suggests refined stylistics as interpretative strategy, which functions to enrich the textual contents. Keywords: Wang Bi, Exegesis of Lao-Tzu, sinology in Europe, Lin Li zhen, Yu Dun kang, Rudolf G. Wagner

王弼《老子注》的詮釋辨證/ Interpretative Dialectics of Wang Bi’s Exegesis of Lao-Tzu