English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Translation has always been a way of communication among different cultures and plays a key role in transferring ideas, information, social and cultural aspects of the source language into target languages and its impact on various aspects of human life is undeniable. There are various theories, strategies, methods, and different types of translation in order to achieve an appropriate translation product. The aim of this study was to know how different types of ironies in Shakespeare’s King Lear are translated into Persian and which ironies remain untranslated. In order to achieve this aim, different types of irony have been chosen as the unit of translation. The corpus of the study as mentioned above, is a tragic play entitled, King Lear, written by William Shakespeare and its Persian translations by Beh Azin and Peyman.

To What Extent the Meaning of Different Types of Ironies in King Lear is Translated and Transferred into Persian by Beh Azin (2012) and Peyman (2002)