English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

By maintaining the wooded environment and regular, planned production of wood, foresters are involved in a longstanding, everyday practise of sustainable development. Gradually and increasingly, they have taken on board other functions since the end of the 19th century such as general public use, protection of water and soils and of biodiversity in general. The requirement — a recent one in the history of forestry — of producing several sustainable management indicators raises two questions. Are ciphered indicators, however many, able to translate the biological complexity of forest ecosystems and of the implications of multifunctionality? How can these indicators useful for the interaction between players? Initial feedback from experience using these sustainable forest management indicators shows that these are still open questions. For these indicators to become one of the shared tools for sustaining the debate on forest management and policies, perhaps one should begin by reversing the order and consider the choice of indicators as an outcome of an agreement negotiated between forest managers and users with the benefit of expert input.

Contribution de France Nature Environnement (FNE) au débat sur la gestion durable et des indicateurs pour en rendre compte