English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Can trade agreements integrate innovations andprogressive dispositions? In this era of fast changes linked to globalizationand technological changes which fuel discontent, this question has emerged inthe literature and in the negotiation processes of many recent agreements. In the first section of this article, we will introduce the structuralchanges that are beneath the surface of recent trade agreements using atypology of trade agreements enabling comparative analysis. In the secondsection, we will discuss some of the most important innovations of theComprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) negotiated by Canada and theEuropean Union. In the third section, we will see that part of the innovativenature of CETA, its evolutionary nature, brings many unsettled trajectories. Inthe fourth section, we will discuss how CETA is further unsettled in itstrajectory because it puts into relation two distinctive integration modelshighlighted in our typology, one developed in Europe and the other in NorthAmerica and, furthermore, because of the more general context that also putsinto play Asia and China as emerging shapers of economic trade agreements.

CETA, an Innovative Agreement with Many Unsettled Trajectories