English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and trichoepithelioma (TE) have some similarities clinically and histologically. The aim of this work is to evaluate the role of Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 in differentiation between BCC and TE. Methods: The immunohistochemical expression of Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 was evaluated in 20 BCCs and 12 TEs in a retrospective study. The localization of these markers in tumor and stromal cells was determined and comparison between BCC and TE was done. Immunohistochemistry for Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 was performed on sections obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks. Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 immunoreactivity in the stromal and/or tumor cells was determined as follows: negative (0); 1+ (10% - 50% positive cells); and 2+ (>50% positive cells). Results: In BCC (20 cases), the expression of Bcl-2 in stromal cells showed (0) immunoreactivity in 8 cases (40%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 7 cases (35%), and (2+) immunoreactivity in 5 cases (25%). Tumoral cells showed diffuse positivity in 20 out of 20 cases (100%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 5 cases (25%) and (2+) immunoreactivity in 15 cases (75%). On the other hand, the expression of Bcl2 in TE, 4 cases showed positive stromal cells out of 12 (33.33%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 2 cases (16.6%) and (2+) immunoreactivity in 2 cases (16.6%), and 8 cases showed no immunoreactivity. Tumoral cells showed positivity in 12 out of 12 cases (100%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 5 cases (41.6%), (2+) immunoreactivity in 7 cases (58.3%). In BCC cases, the expression of CD10 was noted in stromal cells in 8 out of 20 cases (40%), 5 cases showed positivity in stromal and basaloid cells and 3 cases showed positivity in stromal cells only, and 12 cases showed no immunoreactivity (60%). Tumor cells showed positivity in 11 cases out of 20 (55%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 6 cases (30%), (2+) in 5 cases (25%), and 9 cases showed no immunoreactivity (45%). On the other hand, the expression of CD10 in TE 7 cases showed positive stromal cells out of 12 (58.33%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 5 cases (41.6%) and (2+) in 2 cases (16.6%), and 5 cases showed no immunoreactivity (41.66%). Tumor cells showed positivity in 5 cases out of 12 (41.66%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 4 cases (33.33%) and (2+) in 1 case (8.3%), and 7 cases showed no immunoreactivity (58.33%). In BCC cases, the expression of CD34 was noted in stromal cells in14 cases out of 20 cases (70%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 10 cases (50%) and (2+) in 4 cases (20%), and 6 cases showed no immunoreactivity (30%). On the other hand, the expression of CD34 in TE, 10 cases showed positive stromal cells out of 12 (83.33%), (1+) immunoreactivity in 6 cases (50%) and (2+) in 4 cases (33.33%), and 2 cases showed no immunoreactivity (16.6%). Tumor cells showed no immunoreactivity for CD 34 in both BCC and trichoepithelioma, (100%) negative tumor cells. Significant difference of tumor\stromal cells immunoreactivity for Bcl-2 and CD34 in both BCC and TE but it was insignificant for CD10. Conclusion: We conclude that Bcl-2 CD10, CD34 are useful markers in the differential diagnosis of BCC versus TE.

The Role of Bcl-2, CD10 and CD34 Expression in Differentiation between Basal Cell Carcinoma and Trichoepithelioma