English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Purpose: To detect small diagnostic signals such as lung nodules in chest radiographs, radiologists magnify a region-of-interest using linear interpolation methods. However, such methods tend to generate over-smoothed images with artifacts that can make interpretation difficult. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of super-resolution methods for improving the image quality of magnified chest radiographs. Materials and Methods: A total of 247 chest X-rays were sampled from the JSRT database, then divided into 93 training cases with non-nodules and 154 test cases with lung nodules. We first trained two types of super-resolution methods, sparse-coding super-resolution (ScSR) and super-resolution convolutional neural network (SRCNN). With the trained super-resolution methods, the high-resolution image was then reconstructed using the super-resolution methods from a low-resolution image that was down-sampled from the original test image. We compared the image quality of the super-resolution methods and the linear interpolations (nearest neighbor and bilinear interpolations). For quantitative evaluation, we measured two image quality metrics: peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity (SSIM). For comparative evaluation of the super-resolution methods, we measured the computation time per image. Results: The PSNRs and SSIMs for the ScSR and the SRCNN schemes were significantly higher than those of the linear interpolation methods (p < 0.001 or p < 0.05). The image quality differences between the super-resolution methods were not statistically significant. However, the SRCNN computation time was significantly faster than that of ScSR (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Super-resolution methods provide significantly better image quality than linear interpolation methods for magnified chest radiograph images. Of the two tested schemes, the SRCNN scheme processed the images fastest; thus, SRCNN could be clinically superior for processing radiographs in terms of both image quality and processing speed.

open journal of medical imaging

Performance Evaluation of Super-Resolution Methods Using Deep-Learning and Sparse-Coding for Improving the Image Quality of Magnified Images in Chest Radiographs