English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Background: Doxorubicin (DOX) is an effective treatment for many cancers across the age spectrum, but its therapeutic potential is limited because of dose-dependent relation to both progressive and irreversible cardiomyopathy leading to congestive heart failure. While decreases in cardiotoxicity have been reported with liposomal doxorubicin, the long-term cardiac effects are not known. Orotate salts of cytotoxic drugs have been shown to confer antitumor effects with a better safety profile than unconverted drug, and therefore may offer an improved approach to cancer treatment. Materials and Methods: Male, athymic NCr-nu/nu mice with subcutaneously implanted CAKI-1 human renal tumor xenografts were treated with DOX and its orotate salt (DOX-O) to evaluate antitumor activity, measured by median tumor mass doubling time and tumor weight. Nontumored male, athymic NCr-nu/nu mice were treated with DOX, DOX-O and liposomal doxorubicin formulations to determine DOX concentration in liver and heart; and to evaluate their effect on body weight. Non-tumored female, athymic NCr-nu/nu mice were treated with daunorubicin and daunorubicin orotate to evaluate tolerance. Results: DOX and DOX-O exhibited significant, similar levels of antitumor activity. Mice treated with DOX-O had a lower percentage body weight loss. In the animals treated with DOX, DOX-O, or liposomal doxorubicin, liposomal doxorubicin was associated with the lowest percentage of body weight loss, but the highest concentration of DOX in heart. In daunorubicin tolerance experiments, animals showed a better tolerance for daunorubicin orotate as measured by a smaller percentage change in body weight. Conclusions: DOX-O is effective as an antitumor therapy and may offer a less toxic alternative to DOX for maintaining therapy. The lower percentage of body weight loss in animals treated with DOX-O and daunorubicin orotate is a measure of improved tolerance and may translate into better patient outcomes.

Comparative Response of SC CAKI-1 Renal Tumor to Treatment with Doxorubicin HCl and Doxorubicin Orotate