English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Color refinement is a crucial subroutine in symmetry detection in theory as well as practice. It has further applications in machine learning and in computational problems from linear algebra. While tight lower bounds for the worst case complexity are known [Berkholz, Bonsma, Grohe, ESA2013] no comparative analysis of design choices for color refinement algorithms is available. We devise two models within which we can compare color refinement algorithms using formal methods, an online model and an approximation model. We use these to show that no online algorithm is competitive beyond a logarithmic factor and no algorithm can approximate the optimal color refinement splitting scheme beyond a logarithmic factor. We also directly compare strategies used in practice showing that, on some graphs, queue based strategies outperform stack based ones by a logarithmic factor and vice versa. Similar results hold for strategies based on priority queues. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (EngageS: grant agreement No. 820148).

Comparative Design-Choice Analysis of Color Refinement Algorithms Beyond the Worst Case