English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The author searches for explanations why it no longer makes sense to conceive the world in a dichotomized form as “North” and “South”. He argues that globalization has contradictory effects on development, predominantly by making reference to theories of contemporary German geographers such as Fred Scholz and his theory of fragmenting development. Adverse effects are observable both in the so-called “South” and in the so-called “North”; the latter has to deal with its own dissolution which manifests itself for example through new patterns of migration. RESUMEN El autor busca explicar por que no hace mas sentido pensar el mundo en una forma dicotomizada como “Norte” y “Sur”. El argumenta, principalmente a traves de teorias de geografos alemanes contemporaneos, entre cuales se destaca Fred Scholz y su teoria del desarrollo fragmentador, que la globalizacion tiene efectos contradictorios sobre el desarrollo. Esos efectos adversos son observables tanto en el llamado “Sur” cuanto en el llamado “Norte”; el ultimo debe lidiar con su propia disolucion, lo que se maniÞ esta principalmente a traves de nuevos patrones de migracion. Mots-cles: Globalizacion, dicotomia “Norte-Sur”; desarrollo fragmentador; cooperacion para el desarrollo; migracion..

DISSOLUÇÕES DA “DICOTOMIA NORTE-SUL” aspectos geográfi cos do debate sobre o desenvolvimento